Reviewed by Richard Eldridge, Swarthmore College Barfield undertakes to survey, compare, and assess i various conceptions of what he regards as poetry's founding influence on philosophy, centered in poetry's expressions of wonder and of experiences of the divine, and ii philosophy's various self-definitions against that influence, via resistance, counterargumentation, and appropriation. The project is carried out in 12 chapters, each on one or two major figures from the history of philosophy: In each chapter, the focus is on how the various philosophers discussed specifically comment on, resist, accept but refigure, or argue about poetry's putative insights.
Six Arguments Against Subjectivism.
I am a married middle-aged male, a Canadian citizen, a retired bridge engineer, a social democrat—I think that capitalismdespite its waste and obvious injusticeis infinitely preferable to real socialism with its horror of private property and its crazy faith in the incorruptability of bureaucrats and state officials—and a theist.
My intellectual heroes are G. Lewis, Christopher Dawson, and, with qualifications, Bertrand Russell. The first purpose of this website is to give enjoyment to anyone who loves words and ideas by offering an organized collection of aphorisms, quotes, and longer texts.
The second is to advance the cause of liberal education through a new approach. Lastly, this website is linked to an earlier one that makes a case for the feasibility of providing economic security to all Canadians in the form of a Universal Basic Income.
Without recognizing that every philosopher, at some level, is a man of faith, it is impossible to create a level playing field for competing world views.
The principle of valid faith is also the guarantee of intellectual freedom, for faith is the free element in thoughtthe complement to logic which is the necessary element.
Finally, only by accepting the notion that faith is necessary to philosophy can the theist and the atheist maintain their contrary positions without losing intellectual respect for one another.
The inability of the human race, including many of its most brilliant and famous minds, to reach a consensus about these and other crucially important matters suggests to me that the Enlightenment should be amended and extended along the following lines.
Have you ever wanted to read the classics of Western philosophy, but shuddered to think of how much time that would involve? His brilliant idea was to take the works of the great philosophers from Plato to Karl Popper and to condense them to a fraction of their original length—the Confessions of St.
Augustine was reduced fromwords to 10,—while trying to retain their styles and famous maxims. Hughes also provides a short introduction to each philosopher and his work, a glossary, and sometimes a Very Squashed Version of only a few paragraphs.
He even gives an estimate of the time required to read the squashed version, as well as its length as a percentage of the original work. I have made extensive use of this time-saving website and I cannot recommend it highly enough. What makes the book so thoroughly enjoyable is the fact that it is written from the point of view of a man who is passionately interested in philosophy for personal rather than professional or academic reasons.
Magee wants philosophy to shed light on questions that have engrossed and tormented him from childhood, especially the problem of mortality. With such a motivation, it is not surprising that he has many harsh things to say about modern philosophy and philosophers.
He reserves his sharpest criticism for the school in which he was immersed when he attented Oxford in the s, the school known as linguistic philosophy or linguistic analysis. Logical positivism, by then on the wane, also receives much critical attention.
Kant, Schopenhauer, Russell and Popper come in for detailed and mostly favourable consideration. What I think is best about the book is his persuasive case for the bankruptcy of the analytic tradition, a tradition that in one form or another has dominated the English speaking world since Hume.
But he has no love for Continental philosophy, most of which falls beneath his contempt. Magee is not a professional philosopher, but his life-long and practical interest in the great questions probably makes him better equiped than most academics to lead the layman through the maze of this endlessly controverted subject.Plato certainly thought that matters of the greatest importance hang in the balance, as is clear from the famous statement that “there is an old quarrel between philosophy and poetry” (Republic, b5–6).
In his dialogues, both this quarrel and the related quarrel between philosophy and rhetoric amount to clashes between comprehensive world-views—those of philosophy on the one hand, and of poetry or .
Stories of Lao Tzu, Confucius, and Chuang Tzu,Confucius life story. A summary of “Andrea del Sarto” in Robert Browning's Robert Browning’s Poetry. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Robert Browning’s Poetry and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
Free business-day shipping within the U.S. when you order $25 of eligible items sold or fulfilled by Amazon. To understand why such a quarrel took place at Cassiciacum in the first place and why augustine thought it important to include in his earliest writings as a Christian believer, i first offer an overview of the conflict between philosophy and poetry as described in Plato’s Republic.
The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Published: September 01, Raymond Barfield, The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry, Cambridge University Press, , pp., $ (hbk), ISBN