The different sides of using religion as a basis for motivation

This section is about the origin and evolution of the meanings of the expression "criticism". Early English meaning[ edit ] The English word criticism is derived from the French critique, which dates back to at least the 14th century.

The different sides of using religion as a basis for motivation

Answer Wiki 11 Answers Regis ChapmanI have spent the last half of my life studying myth, religion and philosophy. These people usually men were therefore asked about various aspects of life, and so over time a class of people would pass down their understandings.

This still happens, and sometimes people recognize someone like this. Some who realize the Self realize also the futility of trying to teach those who do not want to learn, and instead walk away from public life altogether, or just seem like normal people to the average bystanders, and sort of hide in plain sight.

Often a self-realized person will be married, and as a result the partner can realize the Self also. Adyashanti is a good example, and his wife Mukti Gray later realized the Self, too.

Some people with these understandings inherit their positions and are taught the subtle ways of living and additionally there is a genetic legacy to that. Sometimes, out of compassion and out of this karmic congruence, someone will be born around whom students will appear, as before, but without obvious provenance; except to those who grasp the subtle karmic nature of things.

Brahmin priests in India are an example of both inherited understandings and a massively subtle grasp of the nature of things, plants, rituals and so on. Beyond Brahmin priests, which to me are the equivalent of shamans in native cultures, there are others who are incarnated to realize the Self with the help of a teacher, and in so doing, they can inspire a whole cultural change in their region and this can also spread.

This spread is often co-opted by those in political positions, or through some sincere study with this teacher, and so they recommend or mandate this among their subjects or people in their influence.

Really, the Great Teacher was just speaking about the non dual Truth he was experiencing directly, and out of compassion for the times and circumstances and as appropriate to someone detached from his body and mind and so on he could give direct advice on how to live and solve the common human problems.

To a magician, they perform a series of technical steps, and it looks like a violation of physics. So, even though everyone can be a magician, there is no actual magic, only practice. Some inherit their progress across lifetimes and so have a special karmic load that enables them to both realize the Self AND help others substantially.

It really is just as simple as a teacher teaching, and someone building an organization around them. What happens afterward is not always predictable because so many societal factors come into play.

American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review

Some, as in the case of Christianity, utterly adopt the teachings of a beautiful non dual teacher and change it complete to eliminate and solidify ruling classes over the rise of merchants whose power was increasing and permanent fend off this challenge by attempting to establish a link between themselves and God The Queen of England is a good example of this fictional setup where she claims to be a direct descendent of Jesus himself.

So, over generations, a myth is constructed and reinforced, so that even the origins are now assumed to be true, and taught to their children also, even as their parents taught them. When they have questions, logical or otherwise, the faith or belief thing is brought out, and the followers assume that this must be true.

One way to spread a religion is to offer random other practical advice, money, education read: This is about colonization. Spirituality is something had by someone with knowledge of the Self.

Jesus was a spiritual person, around whom a religion was built. You can say the same thing for Buddha, and Lao Tzu and many, many others. What happened after this teacher left his body is a whole different thing, and has little to do with the philosophy they espoused.

It is not true, just a myth

He made the dual mistakes of teaching authentic freedom his writings, organization and talks are among the greatest spiritual writings in the history of mankind, no joke but he had a fanatic crazy person in charge of his organization, who basically single-handedly destroyed the organization from the inside out by her fanaticism, and there is no world government that can abide REAL freedom by any population larger than aboutand sometimes not even that big.

Thankfully, most so-called spiritual teachers with their own personal religions control themselves by being nut job narcissists and so cannot really do much harm outside their small group of people they exploit; so governments are not usually called in to do anything about them until they become unruly.

In any case, even if they do become uncontrollably large, they can be killed or taken over from the inside, re-writing their scriptures so that their followers are easier to control or rendered impotent.

Others have spiritual or mystical insights and come away wanting to share their knowledge to be confronted by a great many logistical issues.

It is telling how this leadership unfolds post-experience- compare Mormons to Buddhism, for example. Mormons, for example, were encouraged to have many wives, so as to manufacture a large group of followers relatively quickly.

Why is that bad? No REAL reason, but no children aka future potential believers come from men having sex with men or women having sex with women.

Conflict Vs. Mistake | Slate Star Codex

It also highly depends upon whether or not the person around whom the religion is built is involved or not. In the case of Scientology, as an example, here is a clear cult behavior made by a narcissist whose visions of grandeur were worth the human cost to him, and it likely got well out of hand before he could back out of his outrageous control scheme.

It is no surprise that the person who replaced him was highly similar, and even MORE controlling and ambitious, since he already had a great body of people to work with an exploit. In the case, for example of the opposite: Ramakrishna himself could barely take care of himself at all since his mind was for decades almost exclusively pointed at the non dual Self or Brahman.

They had to keep people with him to prevent him from falling over at the sight of anything that would bring his mind back to undifferentiated consciousness.

These are some examples. Where a teacher like Buddha lays down a great deal of wisdom in their lifetime of what properly should guide the nature of everything from food to sex.

The Significance of Social Justice to a System of Peace

A great book on one topic of this unfolding religious guidance is: Lust for Enlightenment by Shambala Press. It also depends upon what basis the society comes from.Different types of motivation are frequently described as being either extrinsic or intrinsic.

Extrinsic motivations are those that arise from outside of the individual and often involve rewards such as trophies, money, social recognition, or praise.

It could just be an exploration of the different sides of an issue. Fighting is not necessarily involved. Criticism is often presented as something unpleasant, but sometimes, that may not be the case. on the basis of experience, what would be the most likely effect of the criticism, and communicate the criticism as well as one can.

The different sides of using religion as a basis for motivation

We present an insightful article by eminent scholar of Vedas and History – Sri Rajveer Arya (aryarajveer @ written three years ago on the issue of Sri Rama being a myth or a historical legend. Since there are historically so many different ways to see the relation, a purely schematic or typological account is not likely to succeed as well.

, the modernist rejection of religion on the basis of a foundationalist empiricism is itself rejected. William Wainwright's Religion and Morality defends the claim that divine command. is approved by the American Psychological Association (APA) to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. maintains responsibility for this program and its content., provider #, is approved as a provider for social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB), through .

An individual’s spiritual motivation and religiosity can be vastly different from person to person and there are many motivational forces that .

What is the basis of religion? - Quora